Part III
Having thought through how a modern-day monastic community might look, I am left with two questions: what would be the point of living life this way, and how would this type of community impact culturally expected aspects of life (work, finances, children, school, marriage, church, etc)?
Why would anyone want to live this way? What’s the point? Well, the point for St. Patrick and his people was to bring Jesus to Ireland, to live in such a way that those around them watch, wonder about, and join in. How can the point be any different for us than to live in such a way that invites others to join in our community and eventually find themselves believe what we believe because they see the truth through our lives.
If the Christian church in the United States was living consistently this way already, we wouldn’t be having this conversation, but instead we find the very real need for a model of life that enables this to happen! Let us remember that using this model, St. Patrick was able to change the culture of Ireland in just one generation. That is an incredible accomplishment. So the possibility of a model of living that can lead to the changing of our culture in a generation is worth considering. It could be that there are other models of life that could accomplish the same thing. If that is the case then let us acknowledge, applaud, and participate in them to see our communities reached with the redemption of the kingdom of Jesus Christ!
What would be the implications of this type of lifestyle on many aspects of life that typically engage in (this is not to say that the practice of that behavior is right or wrong to begin with)?
Well, life would definitely look different. Perhaps the biggest impact on life is the use of time – and this impacts everything else. The way the monastic communities of Ireland functioned were time-intensive. Communal times of prayer and worship, of serving, of hospitality, and solitude severely cut into work hours. If this type of lifestyle requires more time, then work must be diminished and this in turn will impact finances, financial security, and person feelings of self-worth (for those who allow finances to impact their personal identity). The intentional communities of Ireland functioned far more like what it sounds like the Acts church did – they held all their resources in common, shared life together, and met the needs of each other and of the community together.
So living this way would require living on less. But if we were to live together, wouldn’t we need less? Think of how many fewer cars we would need if we became focused on our communities. Think of how much less food we would buy if we had community gardens to grow our own. Think of how much less we would pay for child-care and day-care if we were living in communities that valued children and worked together to raise them. Maybe that’s just the tip of the ice-burg.
Ultimately, for there to be a group of Christians in the United States who desired to live this way, it would take a drastic change in lifestyle, and a re-structuring of values. Maybe that’s not all that bad of an idea. Difficult, yes. Most definitely. But not impossible. Maybe even good.
I’m not making some claim that all Christians in America need to begin living this way, but I’m just inviting you to begin thinking about this. What if, when you begin to consider buying a house, or moving to a new city, or changing neighborhoods, you invited ten other people to consider it with you?

How much would we impact our communities if we had actual pockets of Christians living an alternative lifestyle. Christians in America are invisible. Maybe we say something about morality, or vote by different standards (not always God’s standards), or speak with a little less vulgarity. But what if we stood out because we lived together and we lived different!? How much greater of an impact could we have!
Think about it. And let me know what you think.
Thank you for the comment. I looked at your website, and it looked to me like the purpose of the communities seemed to be for the sake of those living within the confines of the community. What I am looking at is a method of actually evangelizing our world, not escaping from it. I think there is a fundamental difference. Not that what you offer is wrong or bad in anyway, only different from the intention of which I write.
There actually are MANY experiments of the type you mentioned, and other types. Just see our own Association of communities (some traditional monastic types, many not), domestic monastics (married or not in their own homes), urban monastics (often in apartments, single or several living together), hermits etc. Myself a house (small priory in country town, with similar other houses nearby me), etc etc. And mANY types of intentional communities (all fiaths or none) :http://directory.ic.org/21574/TRINITY_Christian_PRIORY/
And my nondenominationla list of more than 465 members (existed for years) at Yahoo, for monastic subjects, practices, vocations, info, news, etc: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/monasterion
John a monk